Life Without Possessions – Why Not? Part 2

November 25, 2015 by

In my previous post, I took a look at Luke’s account of how the first Christians shared everything in common. Their possessions were at the complete disposal of the church. So how are we to understand and apply Acts 2 and 4 today? Are Christians really required to share everything together or not?

Fortunately, the biblical authors usually indicate, or at least give clues, as to how to understand the import of what they were describing. By way of introductions, conclusions, comparisons, and contrasts with other episodes one can glean whether a certain event that happened in the past should be considered exemplary, counterproductive, or simply neutral.

It is clear that in Luke’s account there is no indication exegetically or historically that early Christian communalism was improper or a failed experiment. In fact, what we have is an exemplary description of what a Spirit-endowed community of believers looks like. In light of what we know of Jesus’ teaching regarding possessions, his own example, and that of his disciples who depended on a common fund and forsook everything to follow him, what happened at Pentecost and thereafter is perfectly understandable. No wonder Luke actually calls our attention to God’s blessing on the early church and its common life (Acts 2:47). Remarkably, each time Luke describes how the early church met the material needs of its members he also notes how the church was blessed and grew in number (Acts 4:31, 33; 6:7; cf. 5:14; 9:42 – cf. 9:31; 11:21–26).

Along with being united in devotion to prayer, the apostles’ teaching, the Lord’s Supper, and worship, Luke highlights how all who believed held all things in common. The miraculous liberation of the gospel and justice for the poor are co-equal signs of the arrival of the messianic age and the point of departure for the proclamation of the good news and the growth of the church.

Three men sitting together and talking while repairing a net

Is there any indication that the early church’s common life together failed? First, there is not a hint in the New Testament that the early Christians discarded the Jerusalem church model as being unwise, inappropriate, or a failure. There actually appears to be no other pattern for church life. In fact, in 2 Thessalonians 3:6–15 (also Eph. 4:28 and 2 Cor. 8:13–15) Paul deals with an abuse of church charity that assumes some system of community sharing was in place.

Did other churches have to “rescue” the Jerusalem church, as some have suggested, because their communalism caused their own poverty? No. The church in Jerusalem suffered impoverished conditions for several reasons, but not because of its communalism. Two decades of poor crops developed into a “worldwide” famine during the reign of Emperor Claudius. The Roman province of Judea was hit particularly hard (Acts 11:29–29). The Jerusalem church also experienced tremendous persecution (Acts 8:1; 9:1, 2; James 1:1, 9; 2:6–7; 5:1–6), while also having to support an unusually large number of teachers and apostles and playing host to numerous pilgrims. Beggars, knowing that almsgiving was a staple of Jewish spirituality, also liked to make their home in Jerusalem (e.g., Acts 3:2, 3).

So, was sharing all things in common in the early church a unique, unrepeatable event? Is it something we are really supposed to aspire to, a normative ideal we’re obligated to live up to today? It certainly cannot be in the sense of a pattern to be copied or imitated. Too many extenuating circumstances make this impossible. Nor can it be construed as a universal moral norm, as if Luke was outlining some kind of Christian social ethic separate from the church’s life and applicable to society at large. Luke was not describing what society in general could look like.

What happened in Acts should be viewed paradigmatically – as what life centered in Christ and filled with the Spirit looks like. The first church was the beginning of the Spirit’s new work on earth – a work promised to future generations (Acts 3:37–40) in fulfillment of Jesus’ prayer for unity (John 17:21 ff). As such, it was the first fruit of God’s coming future, a prototype of what the church could become elsewhere as the gospel was preached among the nations. When hearts are struck, when lives are revolutionized, those who believe will eagerly and joyfully band together to show forth the reality of Jesus’ transforming power in their midst. They will gladly exhibit a unity born of the Spirit – a unity of one heart and one mind that explodes into a common life of radical love.

Life without possessions is not only possible, but a consequence of the in-breaking of God’s kingdom. Why all things in common? It’s the same reason why we devote ourselves to prayer and praise, to apostolic teaching, and to a common table and breaking the bread. These are some of the essential marks that distinguish God’s new society. Don’t these outer expressions express a living church infused with the spirit of God’s coming future? Isn’t sharing all things in common a proof that in Christ every wall of division, everything that separates, can come tumbling down?

As a youth I often sang the campfire song, “They Shall Know We are Christians by our Love.” Later on in life, I would regularly sing the hymn, “I Surrender All.” In sermons I would often hear how we were all one in Christ, brothers and sisters in the Lord. And yet, I began to wonder. Was there really anything that concretely indicated this? What actually showed the truth of this in my life? I had to admit I had precious little proof that such unity and surrender actually existed. I and those around me lived pretty much like everybody else in America. Our good Christian lives were lived mostly on a spiritual plane, not here on earth.

This was not the case for the earliest Christians. Jesus was not just Lord in heaven or of one’s heart. His authority and transforming power extended into the warp and woof of life on earth. His kingdom of peace and justice and love were felt and taking effect in the here and now. A brand-new order invaded the old.

What happened in Jerusalem two thousand years ago was a work of the Spirit. The Spirit descended on the church in an unusually powerful way. No one was coerced into sharing anything they had. The first Christians lived out their faith voluntarily, with joy. They weren’t forced into praying or praising God or into anything else for that matter. They simply exhibited a communism of love – the first fruit of the Spirit – and did so in way that changed the world.

The first believers didn’t have to live as they did, they wanted to. This doesn’t mean the life they shared was “optional” or some kind of “alternative.” No, they were compelled from above to live out their faith in concrete ways; their life together manifested Jesus’ lordship over all things, including possessions. They were so filled with the Spirit that they wanted to give themselves entirely, including their property, to demonstrating the reality of God’s kingdom. What about us? Isn’t this something we want to experience and give ourselves to? As Peter told his listeners long ago, this promise of the Spirit is “for you and your children and for all who are far off – for all whom the Lord our God will call ” (Acts 2:39). Comments

About the author

Charles E. Moore

Charles E. Moore

Charles E. Moore and his wife Leslie live in Durham, NC where they form a small house community with friends and visitors...

Read Biography
View All Authors

Recommended Readings

View All

You Might Also Like

View All Articles
View All Articles
  • Your article could be titled: LIFE WITHOUT BEING POSSESSED BY OUR POSSESSIONS– WHY NOT? We ourselves don't possess anything they actually posses us. All material things come from the earth which God has given us ,man only transfers then into the products that we use. Humans are not the original creators but only the processors. That's why Jesus said take new thought for these things because He knew if we did they would take control of us. Where your possessions are your heart will be also. That's the danger they taking control of us. The Bible speaks about people being possessed by evil spirits and materialism can be included in that possessing. It is said what we take into our hands we take unto our hearts. Very true. Jesus owned nothing in His life but the clothes on his back He only gave. The only material things He gave were the fishes & loves & a coin for His & Peters temple tax, even then He said the true bread comes from heaven) everything else He gave in physical form were the healing He performed. People can have nothing but still be very greedy for what they don't have. In the garden they had everything they ever would have "needed" perhaps not knowing "want" at the time. Sharing in "community of goods" does not necessarily make for "good community". But rather sharing out of love & joy of ones heart does one find true happiness & abundant life. Merry Christmas

    Vickie Lynn Welch
  • Please accept a correction on my comment from last night: Please read the reputed earliest church historian, Eusebius, The History of the Church, Book 2, pages 71-104 (New York: Dorset Press, 1965). Eusebius used the Acts of the Apostles, as well as non-canonical sources including Clement, Tertullian, Josephus, and Philo. You will find that the church at Jerusalem was thoroughly Jewish, while also believing Jesus to be the coming Son of Man and Savior. The believers practiced the Law and worshiped at the Temple daily. They continued to live in their own homes, even though they otherwise practiced a community of goods, having sold land and other forms of wealth as need arose among them for liquidity. The Hellenists, i.e., the Greek speaking believers, dispersed under persecution as early as 33 CE. New believers were converted by the continuing witness of the Apostles who remained at Jerusalem during ongoing persecution. You will also find that Mark founded a Christian sect in Egypt that practiced an ascetic communal lifestyle, based on an allegorical and mystical interpretation of the Christian and Hebrew Scriptures. The Egyptian Church built their communities in rural settings so as to live apart from the world, early forerunners of Medieval monasteries in Europe, with men and women worshiping separately.

    Denise Stringer
  • Please read Eusebius, The history of Christianity, especially the sections dealing with the church at Jerusalem. Note that, due to violent persecution and the execution of James the Apostle, the members fled to Perea (modern Jordan) as early as 33 CE, as well as to Antioch and various other regions, thereby spreading the Gospel. Of course, some remained or returned, so that Paul could engage in the Jerusalem Council in the late 40's CE.

    Denise Stringer